There have been some painful moments over the last few months where I think other boards would've pulled the trigger, with the lowest point being that Bolton drubbing. The thing that filled me with dread then wasn't sacking Buckingham, it was knowing that if we did, Williams and Ferguson would be in charge of another recruitment. Des coming good at the right time has spared their blushes.
They spent a small fortune on getting him here and they insinuated his appointment would be good for continuity, despite him playing a very different style to Manning.
We pretty much played 2 games a week for the first few months Buckingham was here. He would've had limited time to get his ideas across and even then, he didn't have an Assistant Manager (despite some being interviewed and offered terms), so that task would only be made harder. He also didn't have a Head of Performance, nor an Analyst. Tim made that shambles of an announcement about Hackett being assistant in the second week of January. Taylor was announced as Head of Performance near the end of February. Moore was announced as the analyst about a month after that.
The latter 2 appointments coincide with the period in time where things started to click and Buckingham started getting the very best out of what he had. That could be purely a coincidence, but I'm not sure it is. Managers are paid to manage, but there is only so much you can get out of the resources you have. For as good as Manning was for us (and he did do very well) his overachievement of getting us to second in the league came off the back of him having a proper backroom staff.
I'm delighted for Buckingham. He has worked incredibly hard in a challenging situation and he's out the other side and stronger for it. I do however wonder if any lessons have been learnt by those higher up than him.