Jerome'SAle
Active member
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 711
Charlie was shown to be wrong on virtually every 'fact' he claimed and this top 5 shite is just the same.
He was right about a lot of stuff too
Charlie was shown to be wrong on virtually every 'fact' he claimed and this top 5 shite is just the same.
No need for a tin hat! I've been following this thread (and other similar ones) and think you've got it about right.Charlie is quite clearly trying to wind up a few posters on here and it is working, with comments about us having a 'Top 5 budget' and 'putting one over our friends down south' etc. No point getting your knickers in a twist whether it is professional for him to say that or not, whether it is professional or not really isn't our concern. I never liked the way he came across on this forum, and on here made a couple real bloopers which showed he didn't know as much as possibly he thought he did.
Most of us on this thread have been following what is happening in Sunderland and of course we have listened to what Tiger has said. So which set of fans do you think feel more bought in to their new owners? Which set of fans has a clearer idea of where additional funds may come from to get them to their respective next level?
Pains me to say it but I wish Tiger and his team were as open with the Oxford fans as CM & DS have been with Sunderland fans from the start. Tiger's first press conference seems shambolic compared to that of SD / CM, we are still not much clearer as to what Tiger's plans are. It seems that there is a good sponsorship deal in place, but what about additional investment? Does anyone think Tiger personally has the funds to sustain us as a top 5 Div 1 / lower level championship team? From a little basic research on-line I don't think he does, so what is the plan?
Charlie may have got his wish and may be a bit of an a**e, but just look at how CM / SD are engaging with their fan base and explaining their plans to what Tiger is doing.
I'll put my tin hat on..
I don't like the way Charlie conducts himself and I don't like his money-motivated reasons for jumping ship to SAFC, BUT his and Stewart's engagement with their new fan base is streets ahead of Tiger's with ours. OK, the Mackems are clearly mugs for lapping up some of the crap Charlie is pushing - his 'genuine' dislike of arrogant Newcastle being the biggest belly laugh - but they like what they hear and seem to be getting behind the new ownership team.
I'm sure Charlie pops on here occasionally and is delighted with the way things are going, particularly our reaction to some of his barbed comments.
Lots of what is being said of course appeals, that's PR for you. It seems like everything that has worked at our club or not worked has been taken notice of and put into their business plan.It's more the style of engagement than the firmness (or otherwise) of actual plans. Charlie's utterings might be suspect, but they're finding an audience. Tiger's saying very little.
It's more the style of engagement than the firmness (or otherwise) of actual plans. Charlie's utterings might be suspect, but they're finding an audience. Tiger's saying very little.
Despite all the mackem a**e kissing have they really told them any more than we have ?
Initial investment will be stewart (tiger)
Look to bring in more investment especially when at higher level.(sartori/ undisclosed)
Delayed up front payment to release funds immediately
Return to the championship and possibly premiership.
Get back to a model of using academy and a decent young manager, who can get the most out of players at the right price.
Apart from the slagging off of the rivals and us, I think they have pretty much matched identically what tiger has said and done so far
Despite all the mackem a**e kissing have they really told them any more than we have ?
Initial investment will be stewart (tiger)
Look to bring in more investment especially when at higher level.(sartori/ undisclosed)
Delayed up front payment to release funds immediately
Return to the championship and possibly premiership.
Get back to a model of using academy and a decent young manager, who can get the most out of players at the right price.
Apart from the slagging off of the rivals and us, I think they have pretty much matched identically what tiger has said and done so far
Definitely think there are a lot of sound bytes in what Charlie says.
I guess I'd feel more comfortable if I knew the answer to a couple of key questions:-
1) Apart from the money owed to DE for upcoming transfer payments, and any monies we may end up paying as a result of the disputed service charges were there really no other debts associated to OUFC at the time Tiger took over? I really hope so, as pre DE we weren't we £8-10 million in debt etc? I don't think we have had a clear answer on that, whilst some people on here have claimed that is exactly the case. It should be very easy for Tiger to clarify. (SD has been very clear with this re Sunderland)
2) Where is additional investment going to come from? Or can Tiger assure the fan base he has more funds than DE to take us forward etc. (SD clearly speaking to JS who is well connected in the football world, that is where some of Sunderland's additional funding may come from etc)
The Singha sponsorship is interesting. I was really impressed with how Lionstrust interacted with the club, they seemed like a very good main sponsor (felt exactly the same about Bridle). Singha may be a bigger name, if it happens how much more is that sponsorship worth & will they interact as well with the fans as Lionstrust did etc?
Now as a fan of course I don't expect to know the ins and outs of every contract signed, but some clearer updates on a couple of significant questions would help some of us more cynical fans.
PR.
f*****g PR.
It bewilders me that (seemingly) so many of our fans seem to be need to be told something or anything, constantly. Doesn't seem to matter if it's true or not, as long as an announcement is made.
Note: This is a general expression of bewilderment and not particularly inspired by any one individual/post/event.
Don't care what the budget is or is meant to be,perform to the best of their ability
and therein lies the issue, the bigger the budget, the better the player's ability. Assemble a few by a splash of cash and you win the league
Exactly. While it is easier to win a league (any league in the world) if you are the richest team in it, it is by no means a given. It's quite possible to buy a load of decent players and absolutely fail to make much of a team out of them. On the flip side, a good manager can take a bunch of less expensive players and make a team out them (Accrington). More difficult though, obviously!Not sure Bury fans agree.
I get what ur saying, but I’d still take actions over words. So far his only real judgeable involvement is a decent manager appointment, two decent signings and keeping Eastwood. Lots of people have given us 5 year plans, budgets and targets and more often than not it just disappoints as while they are what everyone wants to hear it’s a lot harder to deliver them in reality or takes a bit longer.
And bet we hammer them!!!Bet we get them the first game of the season at home...
I don't know why anyone at another club, particularly people in high level roles, has the right to be talking about other teams budgets& probably breaching confidences...................again. Frankly, it's classless.
Not sure Bury fans agree.