- Joined
- 8 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 13,753
I expect most only travelled half an hour from their house in Surrey.Could be worse.
Could be a Man U fan who travelled to London today
I expect most only travelled half an hour from their house in Surrey.Could be worse.
Could be a Man U fan who travelled to London today
The reason his increase is so dramatic is that his current supplier won't give him a new contract so he will be placed on default rates. A lot of commercial suppliers do not want to tender for business which they think will go bust, otherwise they will be left with a lot of pre-bought energy and nobody to use it!Wait until football clubs have to start turning the floodlights on after the next price rise on October 1. It’s going to cost a huge amount of money to stage games this winter. The EFL has already been advised to consider moving all Saturday 3pm kickoffs forward to 12:30 or 1 so as to eliminate the need to use them outside of evening fixtures, but as per they aren’t interested.
Bloke on the radio today said he’s been told his chip shop running costs are about to go up fifteen fold in terms of gas and electric. He pointed out that to put such a rise in perspective, that’s like someone paying £1.80 for petrol today being told they need to pay £27 per litre at the end of next month.
This statement alone would suffice.It would be nice if we had a government
Happened today league weren't bothered.Moving day of fixtures is one thing but KO times I would assume is different. But I may be wrong.
The odd fixture will be moved on police advice due to potential crowd issues, which is why our game was 12:30 today, but clubs can’t just decide to switch times for the sake of it, particularly en masse. The police need to be involved.Happened today league weren't bothered.
BT should have no say about EFL games they only cover Premier games.The clubs can’t move games without it being sanctioned, and BT will have something to say if half the country is clashing with their 12:30 kick offs while SKY’s highlights are no longer first to view as the games become iFollow eligible.
The value of their multi-billion pound TV mega deal with the Premier League is based on assurances that at 12:30 on a Saturday afternoon they will nearly always be the only game in the country. Start moving the majority of EFL games to clash with said 12:30 kickoff and see what happens to the viewing figures. Then see what the reaction to that is.BT should have no say about EFL games they only cover Premier games.
A request based on Police advice.Happened today league weren't bothered.
BT should have no say about EFL games they only cover Premier games.
Bolton were fined £70000 and a 5 point deduction suspended for 2 years.If enough clubs do it they will. After all Bolton cancelled a fixture and only notified the other club/FL via announcing it on social media with no comeback. I'm not sure that the FL management would want this battle should the clubs want to do it as they'll look even more incompetent.
There will be sackings in FL management if clubs aren't allowed to protect themselves as much as possible from the cost of living crisis and this is an easy and obvious way.
Bolton were fined £70000 and a 5 point deduction suspended for 2 years.
That would work. Won’t be doing that then.Keir Starmer demands ban on raising energy prices
Exclusive: Labour calls for the price cap to remain at £1,971 as charities warn Tory leadership candidates of catastrophic impact on the cost of livingwww.theguardian.com
Well Starmer has come back on the cost of living crisis.
That would work. Won’t be doing that then.
Think he realises that it’s in the best interests of the country on this occasion to spoon food the Tories the correct policy, for them to then copy and claim as their own. The implications of not letting them pretend they sorted it out all by themselves are far too severe this time.Keir Starmer demands ban on raising energy prices
Exclusive: Labour calls for the price cap to remain at £1,971 as charities warn Tory leadership candidates of catastrophic impact on the cost of livingwww.theguardian.com
Well Starmer has come back on the cost of living crisis.
Details of how it would be financed are to follow but I guess a greater windfall tax would be the easy answer.Think he realises that it’s in the best interests of the country on this occasion to spoon food the Tories the correct policy, for them to then copy and claim as their own. The implications of not letting them pretend they sorted it out all by themselves are far too severe this time.
Absolutely. We just need a government. One that actually understands that its priority is the people and well-being of this country, rather than itself and its associated cronies and donors. We are so atrociously equipped to deal with this scenario on every single level. It should be the only thing that matters right now, but as usual we’ve all got to sit and wait for the Conservative party to sort itself out. It’s always the same, time and again. Everything in this sodding country comes back to the bloody Conservative party. Let’s have an election because the party can’t agree; let’s have a referendum because the party can’t agree; let’s allow the fire to sweep through the entire house because the party can’t agree. F*ck the party.Details of how it would be financed are to follow but I guess a greater windfall tax would be the easy answer.
No problem either way if it jolts the Conservatives into making a decision.
What we need right now is some sort of certainty going into the next 6 months or so.
I can't wait to see what EY makes of that...I can genuinely see a scenario where millions of people essentially go on strike and stop paying their bills in the next 6-9 months.
Apart from their triple locked pensions and winter fuel allowances....Tory party members, on the whole don’t believe in “hand outs” as they themselves don’t need then & as they are the ones that are deciding the next PM no decision will be made until after the new PM is announced.