chromeyellow
Active member
- Joined
- 15 Sep 2023
- Messages
- 957
offensive and unnecessary. And Meghan was earning a reasonable amount l as a lead actress in Suitsthe English Meghan peut etre
offensive and unnecessary. And Meghan was earning a reasonable amount l as a lead actress in Suitsthe English Meghan peut etre
I have to say that is exactly the opposite attitude to me and I would welcome them into the league.
One of the benefits of the pyramid system is that it rewards achievement, and if Bromley/Solihull or anyone else is good enough, then they should have the chance. After all, *we* had to 'apply' to be allowed into the football league initially - and the attitude that 'well they aren't an old school league club so we won't let them in' would have completely scuppered us! It's better now clubs get there on merit. I'd imagine there are fans of Prem clubs looking askance at the likes of Bournemouth or Brentford (both safe for another year) and saying they aren't 'proper' top flight clubs. If the 'proper old clubs' (who often have a bigger fan base than some of the smaller clubs) can't use their advantages well enough to get out of non-league then that's hard luck. One of them (Luton) have managed to resurrect themselves from non-league and get into the Prem within 10 years (much as I dislike that particular club).
She is just a twisted vindictive woman, Get out Jamie while you can.....Does Rebekah Vardy do anything else beside taking people to court to get money from them? You'd think a woman living a life of luxury because of her loaded husband would give it a rest.
Until she married Jamey Luke foster had the child she didn’t she had no moneyShe is just a twisted vindictive woman, Get out Jamie while you can.....
He would have been contributing to the child's upbringing when the child is with him, no? He has to compensate her for the money she spends on the child, but she doesn't have to compensate him... the logic of child maintenanceIs it too much to ask that a father contributes to his child’s upbringing? Just because her new partner is loaded, doesn’t mean he has to pay for another’s child. Luke Foster is an odious individual who was rightfully shipped out from the club for, shall we say, non footballing reasons, and Rebekah Vardy is also hideous, but that isn’t the kids fault. In addition, the article is from 2017 so not recent.
It's a real shame, I think injury has done for him. He wasn't outstanding for us but was pretty decent and scored a couple of memorable goals.Neither of those look like brilliant signings for FGR in retrospect! I hadn't been keeping tabs on Holland and am slightly surprised how low his stock has fallen; when he was with us, I thought he looked as if he'd have a pretty bright future at a higher level than where he has dropped to. Presumably that 208 minutes is down to injury again?
Er, a father pays child maintenance wherever the child isHe would have been contributing to the child's upbringing when the child is with him, no? He has to compensate her for the money she spends on the child, but she doesn't have to compensate him... the logic of child maintenance
Everything we know about Rebekah Vardy is she's an odious liar. Other than growing a bit of weed I know little about Foster's personal life.
Yeah, so he essentially pays for the child twice... He pays for the time he spends with the child, and also the time he doesn't. The mother only has to pay for the time she spends with them, and even that is still subsidised by the father.Er, a father pays child maintenance wherever the child is
Don't lump Sutton in with FGR!Despite the Oxford links I don’t really want Bromley or Solihull in the league- shame a proper old club didn’t get through. At least Sutton and FGR are dropping out.
Who pays child maintenance depends on who is the custodial parent (i.e., who the child lives with primarily). This can be the mother paying maintenance, although it is really rare.Yeah, so he essentially pays for the child twice... He pays for the time he spends with the child, and also the time he doesn't. The mother only has to pay for the time she spends with them, and even that is still subsidised by the father.
Yes true, I remember they beat Coventry in the cup once.Don't lump Sutton in with FGR!
Sutton have a really rich history in non-league and a solid supporter base. They've had many amazing giant killings and were founded in 1898! They're a smaller club yes but they're nowhere near like a FGR, Fleetwood, Salford or MK. It was a gradual growth done with good management.
It's an old school stadium, good football people around.
Yes true, I remember they beat Coventry in the cup once.
It's just a broken system, really. There should be strict laws on what it can and can't be used for. The way it's calculated is totally wrong too.Who pays child maintenance depends on who is the custodial parent (i.e., who the child lives with primarily). This can be the mother paying maintenance, although it is really rare.
Forest Green were a proper club before Vince, he changed their kit coloir and made them his narcissism vehicle, but they go back to the 1800s and belong around NLS/NL level.Yes true, I remember they beat Coventry in the cup once.
Some of what you have said earlier in this thread I find ridiculous, but I do agree the system is flawed.It's just a broken system, really. There should be strict laws on what it can and can't be used for. The way it's calculated is totally wrong too.
Jack Payne is among the players released by Charlton Athletic.