Concretebob
Well-known member
- Joined
- 6 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 7,347
That's assuming they want to punish them of courseA positive way of counteracting the misinformation is to get factual letters into the Oxford Mail
That's assuming they want to punish them of courseA positive way of counteracting the misinformation is to get factual letters into the Oxford Mail
Sent in quite a few never been printed yetA strong position to be but we need to keep getting the supportive comments in.
A positive way of counteracting the misinformation is to get factual letters into the Oxford Mail
theres more than a few whove written/emailed OM supportive of the Stadium , yet the editorial chose not to publish the vast majority. Anyone would think that a certain pressure group has support there at OM, as well as the tame, FoSB n co manipulated, moderators on Nextdoor KidlingtonSent in quite a few never been printed yet
It only took me 3 minutes to find the Independent consultant liking FOSB social media posts.FOSB's experienced, independent ecological consultant's twitter bio describes herself in her own words as an ' Ecologist, Palynologist (pollen expert) quite good at botany'. based on that I think I will side with Natural England's professional opinion on the plant life
that'll be tucked away towards the back pages, IF it even makes it into OM, and then it'll be a 1/8th page filler.
Absolutely shambolic!It only took me 3 minutes to find the Independent consultant liking FOSB social media posts.
thats hardly an independant consultant imoIt only took me 3 minutes to find the Independent consultant liking FOSB social media posts.
I often wonder when such headlines and stories make it to the Oxford Mail, why the club don’t submit a formal statement setting the position absolutely straight about all the misrepresentations made, and just maybe agreeing with the Ox Mail that they publish this, so everyone is absolutely clear what the true situation is.Met my sister earlier, shes absolutely fuming re a letter from an adrian sutton in todays om...earlier shed been to visit her 2nd hubbys older sister who lives in kidlington near to Sainsburys...her sister in law emphatically and triumphantly ttold my sister that oxford united didnt have to move ' it said so in the oxford mail'
It really is misinformation circulated as fact by FoSB and local councillors that causes people such as her to believe them.
My sister tried and failed to convince her or the real facts, simply she chose to believe a letter making spurious claims based on the badly researched nonesense published on om front page ((and in oxford times) information fed to the local rags by FoSB
Agree with this, whether these images (for the memes) are in the public domain or not, we're better than that, I feel we should stick to challenging bullshit with facts, not memes, we have absolutely no need to get personal with them, we know they're absolute weapons, but the way to show others that is to highlight the crap they talkI agree with this sentiment. Call them out, counter the lies wherever they appear. What I'm not so at ease with is the meme jokes that have been appearing on this thread recently, I don't think they really help. But that's personal opinion, they aren't breaking any forum rules.
Quietly plotting forum domination in the backgroundWhere's Carpy when you need him? A proper Mod.
That's only because she is very friendly, as you delve a bit deeper you find that she is also involved with 'Friends of Milham Ford Nature Park', Friends of Lye Valley, and Friends of Cothill reserves. This is probably just be a coincidence though as FOSB say she is 'independent'It only took me 3 minutes to find the Independent consultant liking FOSB social media posts.
Maybe she is just cautiously neutral?That's only because she is very friendly, as you delve a bit deeper you find that she is also involved with 'Friends of Milham Ford Nature Park', Friends of Lye Valley, and Friends of Cothill reserves. This is probably just be a coincidence though as FOSB say she is 'independent'
I often wonder when such headlines and stories make it to the Oxford Mail, why the club don’t submit a formal statement setting the position absolutely straight about all the misrepresentations made, and just maybe agreeing with the Ox Mail that they publish this, so everyone is absolutely clear what the true situation is.
It can only be they are not as worried about such content having any bearing on the planning application as the fans are, otherwise surely they would have wanted the record to be 100% straight for the clubs sake and everyone concerned. I’m just really surprised at the amount of inaccuracies that are out there about all sorts of things and why the club hasn’t wanted to get on top of all this and accurately inform the public of the real position.
I suspect you might not achieve that if you continue to fold to melts complaining about Chris on a Bike catch phrases!!!Quietly plotting forum domination in the background
Lives in Kidlington but hangs about in Greater leys when we have a match on watching fans arrive? We have barely played at home in the last month, its amazing how many of these people have witnessed our fans P**s in peoples gardens yet the local residents never mention it?
do these (FoSB manipulated) people really not realise that the postcode for the Triangle is OX2 ? ( Kidlington is OX5)And yet another one who believes everything fosb say lies lies and more lies View attachment 18539
Aren't there laws against voyuerism?Some people like to watch football on a Saturday afternoon, others prefer to venture across town from OX5 to OX4 specifically to lurk in bushes with a pair of binoculars trying to spot inebriated young men exposing themselves.
What's the point in dealing with facts if they are of detriment to your argument? These people have lied enough, so what's one more inaccuracy going to do?do these (FoSB manipulated) people really not realise that the postcode for the Triangle is OX2 ? ( Kidlington is OX5)