No matter what happens with these vaccines, it is extremely important the normal steps of regulatory diligence are not overlooked. There is a reason why vaccines require such high safety profiles and take so long to develop; that reason being that they are unique in that they are largely given to healthy individuals for prophylactic use.
There is a reasonable argument to provide these current "first generation" vaccines to vulnerable/high risk groups under an "emergency" use basis, even though the efficacy and safety profiles are frankly very thin.
However, before we start doing mass vaccinations of the population, rigorous age specific risk-benefit profiles must be established, and we simply need much more data to be able to do that. 36 months of long term safety data, in every representative population, is generally considered the regulatory minimum in the industry before a vaccine can be considered as prophylactic in mass public health vaccination schemes. These frivolous suggestion by government to vaccinate "everyone" by spring, and any compulsion or coercion to take such vaccines is quite simply unethical.
Vaccines are one of the greatest medical inventions in history, but lets not misuse them and destroy that reputation further (thus fuelling anti-en developed vaxxer sentiment against all vaccines) in a moment of madness.