Yellow There!
Well-known member
- Joined
- 20 Sep 2020
- Messages
- 1,044
I find it so, so strange to see all the people saying McGuane was bad - but enough people have said it that I am questioning myself. Don’t get me wrong, I didn’t think he was amazing by any means, but (as the commentators mentioned a couple of times) he absolutely glides forwards with the ball, and one such break ended with him playing a great ball out wide right to Sykes. He also played the ball through to Taylor for the penalty, and did a couple more just like it which didn’t come off but were good, progressive, defence splitting passes. A lot of his passing was sharp, one touch, and he kept the ball well. I will read the Oxford Mail player ratings with interest to see if they agree with me that he was head and shoulders above the likes of Kane, Williams and Sykes today, who should be getting far more criticism than McGuane in my view.
I think people are being too complementary to Cheltenham as well, their recent record speaks volumes. Much better than Wimbledon, sure, but a very limited team which on another day we beat comfortably.
Flipping Winnall, and also Williams much as I like him, did sweet football association, I was very surprised when McGuane came off instead of him, thought McGuane was silky and would do well in a number ten role if defensively he's not our best
Last edited: