National News Rishi Sunak

Try this link. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-68077734

Just another grey suit voicing an opinion and/or manoeuvring for someone else.

Three letter slogan for him - Bring. Back. Boris. :ROFLMAO:
Bring back Boris... that's what you want isn't it? Or at least it was a few months ago🤣

I think Simon is more your bring back Liz or parachute in Nigel kind🤪

Anyway, Tory supporters are clearly getting the party they deserve🙂
 
"Tax the rich" they wail................

The Top 100 contributors, ranked by the Sunday Times, were judged to have added £5.35bn to public finances last year.

Meaningless, as it doesn't say how much they earned during the year. And £5bn is what, 10% of HS2, so not a great amount.

And gems like this (taken from the article you quoted, so I'll presume you read it instead of just reading the headline)...

Mr Ecclestone is a new entry after paying £650m in tax and penalties to HMRC to avoid jail. The 93-year-old failed to declare more than £400m held in a trust in Singapore when asked by tax authorities in 2015.

...shows it isn't all done out of a sense of civic duty.
 
Meaningless, as it doesn't say how much they earned during the year. And £5bn is what, 10% of HS2, so not a great amount.

And gems like this (taken from the article you quoted, so I'll presume you read it instead of just reading the headline)...



...shows it isn't all done out of a sense of civic duty.
There's also a certain irony with Essex posting a link from BBC news about tax, when he has stated for the record that he sees the BBC licence fee as a tax that he is evading, whilst using their services :unsure: :ROFLMAO:
 
"Tax the rich" they wail................

The Top 100 contributors, ranked by the Sunday Times, were judged to have added £5.35bn to public finances last year.

I think the issue here is not about those individuals who do pay tax.
It’s about those corporations that do not .
 
Sunak will be chuffed to bits with Lee Anderson, just what he needed right now:


Will Sunak actually do something about it? Especially with the Tory comments about the ex-Labour candidate in Rochdale (who Labour also had to get rid of and finally did).
 
Lee and Lizzie T, with Priti, Kemi and Suella B.

That's the future face of the Tory Party....

Like I said earlier....lots of head wobbling required. At this rate, they'll probably end up with the frog-faced ass-hat as leader, just to put the cherry on top of the whole crazy cake.
 
Sunak will be chuffed to bits with Lee Anderson, just what he needed right now:


Will Sunak actually do something about it? Especially with the Tory comments about the ex-Labour candidate in Rochdale (who Labour also had to get rid of and finally did).
The weak, pathetic idiot will do nothing about it and he won't have to. The Tory press won't make it into a big deal like they did with the Rochdale candidate.
 
Sunak will be chuffed to bits with Lee Anderson, just what he needed right now:


Will Sunak actually do something about it? Especially with the Tory comments about the ex-Labour candidate in Rochdale (who Labour also had to get rid of and finally did).

Maybe because one was speaking the truth, EG: Khan has failed to act against extremists in legitimate protests, and the other was speaking about an unproven "Jewish conspiracy".
 
Sunak will be chuffed to bits with Lee Anderson, just what he needed right now:


Will Sunak actually do something about it? Especially with the Tory comments about the ex-Labour candidate in Rochdale (who Labour also had to get rid of and finally did).

Acted a lot swifter the Starmer did, to be fair.
 
Acted a lot swifter the Starmer did, to be fair.
You would hope so, as Leeanderthal is a sitting MP.....

Good to see Essex bending the definition of truth too (again).

If Anderson had simply said that Khan has failed to act against extremists, that might be one thing, but he actually said that "Islamists" had "got control" of Khan. Slightly different and far more serious accusation, bordering on accusing Khan of being corrupt and a supporter of islamic extremists.

And given the shite that Anderson keeps on coming out with, why would anyone believe a word he says. Another post-truth moron.
 
You would hope so, as Leeanderthal is a sitting MP.....

Good to see Essex bending the definition of truth too (again).

If Anderson had simply said that Khan has failed to act against extremists, that might be one thing, but he actually said that "Islamists" had "got control" of Khan. Slightly different and far more serious accusation, bordering on accusing Khan of being corrupt and a supporter of islamic extremists.

And given the shite that Anderson keeps on coming out with, why would anyone believe a word he says. Another post-truth moron.

A horrible cretin who certainly doesn’t do anything to alleviate my loathing of politicians.
 
Or maybe he hasn`t been watching GBeebies? 🤷‍♂️
Don't be so naive. He would have been briefed to within an inch of his life before appearing on breakfast TV. He would have been told to say he didn't hear it because Tory HQ hadn't, at the time, worked out what it's line was going to be. Yeap, told to lie by liars. That's the Tories these days.
 
Back
Top Bottom