SirAndyOfCrosby
Well-known member
- Joined
- 6 Apr 2022
- Messages
- 1,469
That's really easy in retrospect!
You never know which young players are going to make it.
Good news that these 2 appear to be able to
The point still stands, signing players who haven't played isn't a positive because the youngsters get to play - if they are good enough they should anyway. The two things are mutually exclusive.
You may have gambled away £100k at Ladbrokes and been forced to get a 2nd job to pay your debts - and said job turns out to be great and something you choose to do full time - but that doesn't mean the lost £100k was great. You could have the job as your only job and the £100k. Or even better, have the job and spend the £100k effectively to mean that you don't need to work full time.
Goodrham is a positive, but it does not counter, nor is it because of, the clusterf*cks that Murphy and Baldock are turning out to be.