Scotchegg
Well-known member
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 13,843
Explain?Religious, dietary and cultural to name a few.
How can a vaccination go against any of these?
Explain?Religious, dietary and cultural to name a few.
Yes. Because side effects are exceptionally rare and are significantly less damaging that the virus.So you are calling my wife irresponsible for not having it, after I ended up in the Churchill Hospital for a week with with severe side effects.
Assuming there was no sound reason not to have it, then yes, it's irresponsible.So you are calling my wife irresponsible for not having it, after I ended up in the Churchill Hospital for a week with with severe side effects.
As far as I am aware, there is no religion or culture that forbids vaccination. Please enlighten me.Religious, dietary and cultural to name a few.
I'm sorry but you are way off the mark.Assuming there was no sound reason not to have it, then yes, it's irresponsible.
I think you’re the chap who had severe side effects? Rare, but nasty- I can understand your concern.I'm sorry but you are way off the mark.
As you rightly state everybody has a choice.Using words like 'selfish' and 'irresponsible' to describe people that choose not to have the vaccine is very unfair. Many have extremely good reasons which are not necessarily medical ones.
A proper meltdown.
I can take criticism better than most people and you are welcome to say what you think. I just don't agree with the majority of what you say.There are a lot of people who think "freedom" = "freedom from criticism", and claim their rights are being taken away simply because people are critical of what they have done.
That’s brilliant. Reminds me of ripping yarns and Barnstoneworth United.This is absolutely fascinating viewing from 13 minutes onwards. The karl pilkington of Wednesday. His greenhouse has a hole in it. I actually found myself liking him and hoping he’s ok…! Bleeding faff lad . Have a brew before yee go round the twist
As far as I am aware, there is no religion or culture that forbids vaccination. Please enlighten me.
It's called freedom of choice and once it is removed we are on a very dangerous road indeed.
I agree.As you rightly state everybody has a choice.
My view is that the majority not having vaccinations are selfish and irresponsible.
Did anyone else think, Jonny Vegas?That really is sensational.
I’m afraid so. Nobody is suggesting choice be taken away - it’s one of the things that makes this country such a fortunate place to be. However, I am only 28 and I also had particularly severe side effects from the 2nd jab - the 1st I didn’t even notice. Even with hindsight of what was a pretty difficult few days, I’d do it all again - give me a 3rd one. We all go in to the vaccine with our eyes wide open because the bigger picture is my one year old boy, my Mrs, my parents, my colleagues and their families - even the elderly neighbours I have. It’s wrong to assume anybody is above/beyond a non-discriminate virus. My personal view is if you won’t do it for yourself, the safety of the masses (including countless people out there who have probably done you a favour or two in your lifetime, not to mention the NHS) should be enough motivation. People need to see the vaccine is not about any one individual now, it is about protecting everybody for the long-term.So you are calling my wife irresponsible for not having it, after I ended up in the Churchill Hospital for a week with with severe side effects.